Topic on User talk:PeaceDeadC

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tomas bobek (talkcontribs)
PeaceDeadC (talkcontribs)

Hi Tomas. GDPR is a regulation in EU law on data protection and privacy for all individual citizens of the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA). PBC is not subject to the jurisdiction of the European Union laws and regulations. All materials posted on this site are regulated only by PBC's internal policies.

Tomas bobek (talkcontribs)

Oh :( I see, is it possible to delete a post for human and ethical reasons? He cannot find normal work on the Internet because of the past. Thanks

PeaceDeadC (talkcontribs)

The human and ethical reasons are not a criterion for removing information from an article. The criteria for deleting information are:

  • Inaccurate or false information not confirmed by reliable sources.
  • The information in the article violates the PBC neutrality policy.
  • The information that does not comply with the privacy policy: Passport data, address, phone number. Names, addresses and phone numbers of relatives.
Tomas bobek (talkcontribs)

Personal Data Violation - Photo and name. cyberbullying... Isn't that enough to delete an article?

PeaceDeadC (talkcontribs)

An article about this porn actor does not violate any PBC privacy policy. If this person did not want to be associated with pornography, clearly he should not act in porn he did. For the life choice of the person this encyclopedia responsibility does not bear. Have a nice day.

Tomas bobek (talkcontribs)

I understand you. In this field no longer does. However, there is currently no possibility to find quality work in another field. His name will forever be associated with pornography because of this site. Could you please delete the article? Thank you

PeaceDeadC (talkcontribs)

False. His name will forever be associated with pornography because he did porn. This site contains articles about people who did porn. The article contains FACTS about the man who did porn. The information in the article is taken from open sources and reflects only FACTS, no original research. Thus, I see no reason to delete the article about the person who did porn from the encyclopedia about people who did porn. (talkcontribs)

did you also know this things when you create a profile with my name ? Any UNAUTHORIZED use of my profile, video, pictures or audio in any form or in a forum now or in the future is NOT permissible without my expressed written consent.

Any act to promote or gain profit in any manner (e.g. either monetarily or socially) from the use of my profile, video, pictures or audio in any form my profile is a violation of my privacy and subject to legal action.

BY WATCHING THIS you acknowledge and agree that you shall not post, upload, publish, transmit or make available in any way content of this page including images and recording streamed live video available for download.

This is intended as, and presented as a one time, live, one view presentation only.

Penalties of Copyright Infringement: By reproducing, republishing or redistributing the work of a copyright holder without permission, you may be violating or infringing on his or her rights under the Copyright Act.

The copyright holder may sue for compensation cost from $ 250 to $ 150,000 or one year in jail."

you might not gain any monetarily profit but you gain socially one so this is able to be a legal case . You also make avariable images from a streamed live video .

PeaceDeadC (talkcontribs)

Please specify the source from where you are quoting the text. Thanks. (talkcontribs)

the text is written on the profile from the porn site i work on . and anyone that read it acknowledge that they do not have my consent to take pics, recordings or republish the materials they find on internet . "With any kind of property, its owner may decide how it is to be used, and others can use it lawfully only if they have the owner's permission, often through a license. The owner's use of the property must, however, respect the legally recognised rights and interests of other members of society. So the owner of a copyright-protected work may decide how to use the work, and may prevent others from using it without permission. National laws usually grant copyright owners exclusive rights to allow third parties to use their works, subject to the legally recognised rights and interests of others. Most copyright laws state that authors or other right owners have the right to authorise or prevent certain acts in relation to a work. Right owners can authorise or prohibit:

reproduction of the work in various forms, such as printed publications or sound recordings;

distribution of copies of the work;

public performance of the work;

broadcasting or other communication of the work to the public;

translation of the work into other languages; and

adaptation of the work, such as turning a novel into a screenplay."

PeaceDeadC (talkcontribs)

and? PBC is not Wikipedia. PBC follows only its own internal policies regarding content that is hosted on PBC servers. Please, in the future, refer only to the internal policy of the PBC or the decisions of the PBC's administrative committee. Have a nice day.

Reply to "delete post"